Hospitality Management Major - Culinary Class Term Project Outline Term Paper

Hospitality Management Major - Culinary Class Term Project Outline Term Paper Hospitality Management Major Hospitality Management Major - Culinary Term Project Outline The Blue Hill New York was started by Davis, Dan, and Laureen Barber. This restaurant is located in Blue Hill and Stone Barns in Pocantico, New York, which is well known for the food prepared by Chef Dan Barber and his associates. The original Blue Hill restaurant opened in the year 2000 in Greenwich Village (Blue Hill Farm). This restaurant is also well known for its location on an estate that is built for the Rockefeller family in the year 1930’s. The intention of the owners of this restaurant is not just to fill the customers’ stomach, but they aim at forming a relationship with its customers. In many cases, employees engage customers in conversation about all things. The level of hospitality and the many varieties of fresh food served in this restaurant is one where a person can arrive with the intention of ordering one specific thing and end up ordering much more. The Blue Hill New York its high quality p roducts that come fresh from the nearby firm, including the Stone Barns Center for Food and Agriculture, and the Blue Hill Farm in Great Barrington, Massachusetts assures customers that they will get their value for money. The restaurant not only aims at selling quality local food, but also aims at providing the best services. Employees help the restaurant deliver the best service by upholding the highest level of etiquette by being friendly to customers. The staff also provides any other assistance required to make sure that the customer is satisfied. Blue Hill Farm. Blue Hill. 2014. Web. 19 9 2014.

buy custom Case Analysis-Terri Schiavo essay

buy custom Case Analysis-Terri Schiavo essay Terri Schiavo was a legal case in the United States of America that involved the parents of Teresa Marie Schiavo and her legal guardians. Teresa Schiavo was commonly referred to as Terri. Terri was the main subject of this legal case. In 1990, she collapsed at her home in St. Petersburg, Florida due to cardiac arrest. Her brain was damaged due to ineffective supply of oxygen, and she remained in a coma for two months. Her condition was elevated to vegetative state. Doctors tried to restore Terry to the state of awareness through physical and experimental therapy. In 1998, her husband felt that her feeding tube be eliminated, and he filed an appeal in line with the Florida Statutes contained in section 765.401. Terris parents who claimed that she was in her conscious state objected this. The issue reached the level where the only solution could be found from the court. The court held that Terri did not wish to continue with the life prolonging measures. Her feeding tube was thus remov ed, but it was later reinserted after the court gave an injunction to stop the removal of the feeding tube. In 2005, a court in Penillas County ordered that her feeding tube is removed. This led to numerous appeals in courts concerning the issue. The most significant appeal was the one signed by the then US president George W. Bush, to keep her alive. The appeals in the federal courts come and passed, but the origin decision of removing her feeding tube was up held. The tube was removed on 18 March 2005, and; unfortunately, she passed on just a few days prior to the removal. An individual is obliged to turn down medical care if one feels he is all right. For instance, the court asserted that Terri did not wish to continue with the life pro-longing measures. This meant she did not wish to continue with the medical care in the long- run. This was her right and no one could object to it. Her wish against medical care was to be adequately addressed because there was a feeling that she was self supportive. The case brings out both moral and ethical issues. The moral issue drawn from the case is greed. It is perceived that Terris husband takes the decision to have the feeding tube disconnected just because of his greed to posses Terris estates after her demise. Greed is the worst part of life that makes individuals decide anythng malicious against others. For instance, Terris husband was aware that the removal of the tune could result in the ultimate death of his wife, but he did not care. This was against her parents wishes. The husband was also aware that Terri was going to die intestate. This meant he could be the ultimate owner of the vast estates left behind. In this case, I would prefer that Terri be cared for in the life prolonging medical care to keep her for a longer time. This is just the human position to take because each one of us has a right to live until the right time for death comes. In addition, no one is supposed to terminate the life of another individual due to the greed of acquiring the remaining estates and property. The theory of human life and how best to live would be vital in explaining this ethical issue. All humans have a right to life and their lives are valuable. Life should thus be treated as a vital gift to humans that cannot be compared to matters such as property. Human beings must keep in mind that all other individuals have a right to existence and achievement of their dreams whichever even if their condition is unpredictable. Terri would ultimately die. This is because the tube that supports her life would be eliminated thus exposing her to death. She would not be able to survive any longer, as there are no support systems for her feeding mechanisms. Her husband would enrich himself. This is because it is in his best of interest that Terry dies and leaves behind the estates. He would thus gain from the death of Terri due to his greedy behavior. The doctors would be defeated to make a choice between supporting life or killing. The doctors duty is to facilitate the healing of an individual and not to kill. The elimination of the tube would be a way of killing Terri; this would leave them in a dilemma regarding what to do. The taxpayers would have to have to pay more to support the life of Terri if the tube is not eliminated. The parents would end up losing their beloved daughter due to the elimination of the tube. Terris parents would have supported my ethical position to have Terri continue living because she is their daughter and they still cherish her. On the other hand, her husband would be against this because he needs Terris estates after her demise. The health pollicy consideration in this case is that an individual is attended to according to his wish. The law asserts that an individual can choose the kind of attention he needs. If one feels that his condition is too critical and could not survive any longer, he has a right to call off medical care for self-support. In addition, the health policy provides that an individual would be cared for according to his wish. For instance, Terris husband claims that she did not wish to continue with the prolonged medical care and her wishes were ultimately addressed. The health issues relating to individuals are vital and should be treated with the utmost care. Tong (2000) asserts that matters relating to the lives of other people should be put into consideration before making any decision relating to their further treatment. Due care should be the guiding principle to ensure that all other individuals have a right to life. Human beings should not give up even if they are in a critical state that is perceived so complicated. For instance, everyone should have supported the issue that Terri stays with the tube for a longer period in order to ensure she continues living. The ethical issue arising from the case could have been avoided. For instance, if a will had been earlier drafted the husband could not have pushed for the removal of the tube. He would have known his position in the will in advance and thus the greed to own Terris estates would be eliminated. These issues would not have arisen. In addition, it could be avoided by mutual agreement on the course of action needed. If the parents and the husband had talked about the issue, there could be no conflict of interest. They could have decided on one course of action, and they would have pursued. They would have probably settled on the course of action that is beneficial to both of them. This would assist in saving the life of Terri. This basic issue could have been solved in an easier manner if each party was told of the benefits of saving Terris life. In conclusion, the Terry Schiavos case spanned across many years and various questions abound regarding the validity of the decision argued by different parties concerning whether she should be allowed to live via life support, or her life be terminated. Thus, the case arises different ethical issues. Buy custom Case Analysis-Terri Schiavo essay

Business Strategies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Business Strategies - Assignment Example Therefore, it is capable of getting large and deep discounts from the suppliers, thus giving the company an augmented purchasing influence as compared to the retailers. By making more sales and fast stock turnover, the company collects imbursement from clienteles before the dealers payments due date (Thompson, 2009). Hence, Costco gets more markdowns on cost and pass the reserves on to the consumers by reducing the prices. Additionally, the threat of out of date stock, one of the foremost fiscal problems, is reduced. The main fundamentals of Costco’s policy are a reduced price, restricted collection and controlled merchandise line. The company’s costs for high-quality countrywide and local products were far much lower than its competitors. Costco’s inventory only consisted of products whose prices could be bargained, hence offer customers noteworthy savings in expenditure. The main aim of the pricing strategy was to limit its gain on trademark products and for th e private label creation, â€Å"Kirkland Signature†. ... However, the company purposely restricted the assortment in every merchandise category to rapid- selling model, magnitudes and colors. This gave the customers a wide selecting range for the commodities, hence male more sales. Additionally, the treasure-Hunt Retailing policy was used to entice the members. In this case, almost a quarter of the product hand-outs were frequently varying, so the company’s product buyers kept on looking out to make occasional purchases of goods that would petition to the business’ customers and that would be rapidly bought. Some of the products could always be found in the company, while a few of them were the treasure-hunt materials, which kept on changing. Therefore, customers could self-assuredly walk in the shops to buy them. Hence, customers procure these products every time since they may not be found in the next stock. The company acquired its products officially on the gray market from other merchants or distraught dealers who would want to avoid excess or slow-moving stock. As a result, it made more sales than its competitors who did not apply this strategy. Further, because of the company’s cheaper prices and being well known for treasure-hunt storing, it spent less on marketing as well as advertising their products. This is because; the company did not need to engage into widespread promotion of their commodities unlike other companies that were not that eminent, thus cut on expenditure. They only used direct mail advertising, which they believed was cheaper (Thompson, 2009). Costco also applied the growth policy, where they opened various locations each year, especially in the United States as well as worldwide. The company opened several warehouses in different countries that